Sunday, February 26, 2012

What IS the church???

Hello all,

I'm traveling much these days so my "writing" time has been limited, but my reading time has expanded greatly. I came across a newsletter that I find to be insightful, educational, discussable & best of all - CONTROVERSIAL! I find it both necessary and important to challenge our ways of thinking. Do we do things because it's the best way to do them or do we do things out of habit? I always like asking "why". Why do we carry on doing things even if they make no sense or have no practical value. So I invite you to explore this wonderful newsletter offering a reminder that doing the popular thing does not make it the best thing to do. Enjoy!

Sabbath Day Devotion
January 14, 2012


What the Church is NOT (part 20) –

We continue to receive a tremendous amount of encouragement and support in response to this series.   Because these devotions are being forwarded to many, many people, we are receiving a multitude of new subscribers every week.  

NOTE: If you did not receive earlier installments to this series or if you deleted earlier installments, feel free to reply to this email and request the “entire series.”

Hundreds of people are getting a glimpse of what an unconstrained Holy Spirit led church is capable of doing.   Unfortunately, most of these people are trying to make their new concept of what the church should be fit their old paradigm of what they have always thought the church was.   Understandably, they don’t know how to go from where they are to where they want to be.

I have thought about this a lot.   I have discussed it with others.   I hope God will enlighten me and make it possible for me to discuss it in more detail in a future devotion.   At this point, though, I am led to believe that what we are most inclined to do will be similar to pouring new wine into an old wine skin.


The Church is NOT:
  • a man-made building
  • a man-made denomination
  • a set of man-made doctrines
  • for unbelievers (non-Christians)
  • a social club or gossip center
  • an entertainment center
  • an event that has a dress code
  • a place to drop off your kids
  • a place where large crowds sit in rows staring at the back of someone else’s head
  • an organization with a distinction between clergy and laity
  • an event that must start at a specific time on a specific day
  • a substitute for individual Bible study and prayer time
  • the only place you should act Christ-like
  • a 501.c.3 organization
  • an organization that is based on anyone other than Jesus Christ
  • headquartered here on earth

We have discussed the first ten of these “What the Church is NOT” statements.   We will discuss the eleventh in today’s devotion.   Based on previous experience, this devotion is sure to raise some hackles.   Many will label me as a heretic.   So be it.   It won’t be the first time – and I am sure it won’t be the last.


The Church is NOT…
an event that must start at a specific time on a specific day.

Most Christians meet every Sunday morning for worship.   Why is that?   Is Sunday the day God set aside for worship?   Does the Bible instruct the church to meet every Sunday morning?

Most Christians are surprised when they discover the real reason they meet every Sunday morning for church services.   The real reason most churches meet on Sunday is because the Roman Emperor Constantine mandated that Sunday would be the official day of assembly and rest – in 321 A.D.   Constantine is quoted as saying, “On the venerable day of the Sun let the magistrates and people residing in cities rest, and let all workshops be closed.”   This was not only for Christians, but for the entire Roman Empire.

Since my occupation is in agriculture, I found it very interesting that Constantine went on to say, “But let those dwelling in the country freely and with full liberty attend to the culture of their fields; since it frequently happens that no other day is so fit for the sowing of grain, or the planting of vines; hence, the favorable time should not be allowed to pass, lest the provisions of heaven be lost.”

Please keep in mind that I just quoted Constantine – NOT the Lord our God.

Most church groups have been meeting on Sunday for so long that they fail to realize that doing so is nothing more than a man-made tradition that has very little support in the Holy Scriptures.   As I have said several times since we started this series, it’s funny how our traditions (mine included) will eventually seem “biblical” – if we practice them long enough.

After reading and rereading the book of Acts as well as the New Testament letters, I’m convinced that the early Christians met together as “the church” whenever it was convenient.   There is evidence that some met every day – at least for a while.   It is believed that they often came together as the church before and/or after work.

Every day they continued to meet together in the
temple courts.   They broke bread in their homes and
ate together with glad and sincere hearts...   And the Lord
added to their numbers daily those who were being saved.
Acts 2:46-47

Many historians believe Constantine was trying to unite pagan sun worship with Christianity.   The wording of his law shows that at the time of its inception he was wavering between paganism and Christianity.   By calling Sunday "the venerable day of the sun," there is no doubt that Constantine had high esteem for pagan sun worship.

There were several other man-made Sunday laws between 425 A.D. and the 1600s.   For example, in 789 A.D. Charlemagne (King of the Franks) decreed that even normal "servile" work was to be avoided on Sunday so that the day could be set aside for holy worship and thanks to God for His goodness.   This Sunday law further expanded the role of State in church affairs by affecting personal behavior.

I have often been told that we meet on Sunday because that is the day our Lord arose from the grave.   That is why Easter is always celebrated on a Sunday.   Keep in mind, though, that there was no formal celebration of the resurrection of Christ (Easter) until the reign of Constantine during the fourth century.   There are also two scripture references that many church leaders use to try to provide some evidence that the early church met on Sunday (the first day of the week).

In Acts 20:7, Luke records, "On the first day of the week we came together to break bread..."   Please read Acts 20:7-12.

In biblical times, the Jewish day started at sundown of the previous day.   Concerning these particular verses, most Bible scholars believe these believers came together after observing the Sabbath (Saturday).   Shortly after sundown (the beginning of Sunday), the Apostle Paul began to talk.   Since he was leaving the next day, Paul kept on talking until midnight when one of the listeners fell asleep and fell out of a third story window.   The time of this meeting would have been the equivalent of our Saturday night.

You can read as much into this as you want to.   Personally, I do NOT think these verses insinuate that every church group met on the first day of every week.   All it says is that this particular group of believers happened to meet at this time to listen to Paul because he was leaving the next day.   If you are using these verses to support your belief that the church should meet on the first day of every week, then you should start your meetings Saturday night – instead of Sunday morning.

In 1 Corinthians 16: 2, the apostle Paul said, "On the first day of every week, each one of you should set aside a sum of money in keeping with his income, saving it up, so that when I come no collections will have to be made."   Please read 1 Corinthians 16:1-2.

Paul instructed the Corinthian believers to set aside money for the impoverished Christians in Jerusalem.   Note that these verses say nothing about Christians coming together with other Christians on the first day of the week.   They also say nothing about bringing money to a church meeting or a church building (there were no church buildings).   The Corinthian Christians were simply instructed to set aside some money on the first day of the week.   They were told to save it up “so that when I (Paul) come no collections will have to be made.”

Most of us try to interpret scriptures to fit our preconceived thoughts and ideas.   Most of us have been GOING to a church building at a specific time every Sunday morning.   Part of our weekly agenda is to pass the collection plate.   The money that is collected is handed over to the church treasurer to manage for the church.   Therefore, when we read these two verses, we automatically visualize what we experience every Sunday morning.   We forget that there were NO church buildings, NO collection plates and NO church treasurers when the Apostle Paul wrote these instructions.  

Once again, you can read as much into these two verses as you want to.   Personally, I believe the Apostle Paul was simply instructing each Christian in Corinth to set aside some money that could be shared with the Christians in Jerusalem.   Each person or family was “saving it up” so that it would be ready when Paul came.   They did NOT take their money to some church building and hand it over to a church treasurer for safe keeping.

These are the only two places in the New Testament that even come close to talking about believers coming together on Sunday.   I am still under the impression that the early Christians met as often as possible.   They did NOT have a specific day or set time for worship.   They were busy BEING the church.   The concept of GOING to church had not yet been invented.


Does this mean it is wrong for modern-day Christians to always meet on Sunday?   No, not necessarily.   I think we need to realize, though, that God was NOT the one who made Sunday the official day of worship for Christians.   Unfortunately, many of the Christians I have had fellowship with over the years seemed to be worshipping Sunday more than they worshiped the Lord our God.   I’m sure the same could be said of many Sabbath Keepers about Saturday.

Folks, you do NOT have to wait until a specific time on a special day of the week to have fellowship with other Christians – and you do NOT have to go to a special building to have fellowship with other Christians.   In my not-so-humble opinion, these are the two biggest problems with the church today.   Those who belong to the religious majority are so obsessed with GOING to church that they don’t realize that they are supposed to BE the church.


Don’t just GO to church; BE the Church


Kit Pharo
Pharo Cattle Co.
Cheyenne Wells, CO
Phone: 1-800-311-0995

If you no longer want to receive our emails,

If you have friends you would like to add to our
e-Group, send us their names and email addresses

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Jesus or Gandhi? Why not both??


As a believer of Jesus, there is a question I wrestle with daily, much like the man Jacob wrestles with in that story in Genesis. Can Gandhi be in heaven? I find the knee-jerk reaction from most "Christians" is "NO". Their common argument is that Gandhi was not a Christian. This point of view has some holes in it, in my humble opinion. I don't believe this to be the case. My reasons for believing in Jesus lead me to believe that this is not true. In fact, I believe that we often are misunderstanding what the bible has to say about the matter.
As always, when discussing matters of theology, we embark on a never-ending journey. The questions I ask are not new to arena of discussion. And I do not expect to reach a solid, confirmed answer by the time we are through. Jesus has been discussed and cussed for 2000+ years. I simply desire to present some different points of view to ponder. I only question authority when I think authority is questionable (wink).
So Gandhi cannot be in heaven because Gandhi was not a Christian. Well, believe it or not, neither was Jesus. As the bumper sticker so proudly states, "My father is a Jewish carpenter". The first mention of the word or term "Christian" does not appear until the Book of Acts 11:26 (shown in context here). Jesus was Jewish in birth and upbringing. The lessons of Jesus are rooted in Old Testament teachings. This is important to note because I have personally observed some Christians negating the value and importance of the Old Testament, believing that it is the "old" way of living and no longer of importance.

ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE!

While I do confess that reading the Old Testament books like Leviticus & Deuteronomy are a exciting as a grocery list at times, to do away with their teachings is like saying that your grandparents are outdated and useless because they can’t operate an iPad! You need to know where you came from in order to understand where you’re going. For example, I have no desire to ever repeat my pubescent years, yet I would be a fool if I were to discard them as having no effect or value on my life.
I struggled a lot with trying to make some sense out of the Old Testament until I came across "The Bible Jesus Read" by Philip Yancey. In his book, I found comfort & companionship in writers who asked, nay, SCREAMED aloud some of the same questions I have. To know that Moses was just confused about what his purpose in life was as I am gives me peace to know that I'm not alone in my confusion. That Jacob “wrestled” with trying to understand who God is just like I am today brings me peace to know that it’s okay to question God. In fact, after wrestling with God, Jacob was given a new name – Israel, which means, “To wrestle with God”.
We take pride in names. Our country is boldly proclaimed “The UNITED STATES of America”. A name of unity, strength & togetherness. Bold. Strong. But our Middle East relative announces its identity as a nation “wrestling with who God is”. I feel there is something to be learned in the humility.
I was overjoyed as I continued to read, to discover a God that delighted in being challenged! Abraham and Sarah uttered aloud their doubts about being able to have a child when they were 90+ years of age, as God said they would. They weren’t condemned for asking. They were blessed with a beautiful baby after decades of despair. Moses lead thousands to a new life yet sounded like Porky Pig when he spoke. Can you imagine seeing a presidential debate with a Looney Toons character on stage? (Oh wait, we already are…)
What about Grace? One lesson spoken of repeatedly is the GRACE of Christ. Grace is a summary of what Christ is about. His dying on the cross to give us life that we don’t deserve. Grace. A gift. Never earned. Never purchased. Freely given to us who believe in Christ. It has been hypothetically discussed that even a man like Hitler could have received the saving grace of Christ if he asked for forgiveness in his final moments. A rather uncomfortable point to remember is that Hitler was raised Catholic and professed a belief in Christ in his adult years.
This is where it gets ugly. I betrays our sense of “justice” to consider such ideas. Yet, we have the story of the thieves on the cross, alongside Jesus. One thief asking Jesus to be remembered when Jesus comes to His kingdom. Jesus responds “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise.” (Luke 29:39-43). Here was a man making his first or final confession and is promised forgiveness. He gets heaven.
We do not know what his crimes were. That is omitted from the story. What if he was a rapist? What if he slaughtered children? What if he was like John Wayne Gacy or Andrea Yates? We convict people like this in the court of our minds well before they ever reach the courtroom. Yet Jesus promises this man eternity in heaven. A reward none of us would readily give.
So Jesus is quick to forgive and honor the thief’s last request. Grace. Jesus can do so for any that ask willingly, if scripture is true or that is what the heart of the message is.
But there seems to be something so unjust about it. We demand justice and we want to believe that someone as evil as Hitler is roasting away as a eternal piece of human charcoal. But GRACE is not justice. Grace is unyielding, unbiased, love.
What about Gandhi? Can a man, who is world renown for his non-violent stand against oppression & injustice be enjoying the rewards of heaven? Again, most Christians would be quick to say “NO” since Gandhi was not a Christian. What does the bible say about what it takes to get to heaven?
In John 14:6, Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” I tend to think that many read this verse as definitive proof that one must be a Christian in order to get to heaven. But as we many time do, we add words to make scripture say what we want to believe. It does not say, “become a Christian and you will go to heaven”. In fact, even just being a Christian does not guarantee that you have a ride to paradise. I can find more verses that indicate otherwise.
For example, Matthew 5:20 says “For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven.”
So does this mean I need to be holier than a priest? Does this mean that priests will not go to heaven?
Matthew 7:21 says “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.”
Okay, so does this mean that not all believers get to heaven? Or that all I need to do is follow God’s ways like Jesus says in “the Greatest Commandment” as written in Matthew 22:35-40
35 One of them, an expert in the law, tested him with this question: 36 “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?”
 37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’[a] 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’[b] 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”
So John Lennon was right! All you need is LOVE!
Now I don’t say this to make a mockery of the bible, but I do believe that this is all you really need to know about the bible. If we devote our time to just trying to love each other, I think the rest will fall into place.
But back to Gandhi. Can a man as loving and inspirational as Gandhi be in heaven? Can a “Catholic” like Hitler have the same access to eternal peace and salvation as Gandhi, who said, “Anger and intolerance are the enemies of correct understanding.”
But again, there is the discussion of John14:6. Yet Gandhi is also quoted as saying “I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ.” Unfortunately, I find this to be true more often than I care to admit.
I read in this quote that Gandhi indeed acknowledges Christ. I also see where Gandhi is quoting Matthew 7:21, to where “not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven. I would like to invoke the challenge to entertain the idea that if it is indeed possible for a wretched sinner like Hitler to be forgiven & enter the Pearly Gates, a majestic proponent of peace and love, like Gandhi, can be there alongside. A reminder that we as “adults” make things more complicated than necessary.
Maybe we need to pay more attention to a childlike way of being. Jesus recommends it repeatedly. To be innocent like a child seems to have been the greatest achievement one could aspire to.
Look to Matthew 18:2-5, At that time the disciples came to Jesus and asked, “Who, then, is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?”
 2 He called a little child to him, and placed the child among them. 3 And he said: “Truly I tell you, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. 4 Therefore, whoever takes the lowly position of this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven. 5 And whoever welcomes one such child in my name welcomes me.”
Or how about in Luke 18:15-17; 15 People were also bringing babies to Jesus for him to place his hands on them. When the disciples saw this, they rebuked them. 16 But Jesus called the children to him and said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. 17 Truly I tell you, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.”
So I propose that we stop the fight, sit down to a meal of milk and cookies and act like children, for we have license to do so. A childlike faith is all that is needed to get to heaven. And if this is true, then the simple faith of a simple man like Gandhi was more than enough to “earn” salvation. Besides, why do we argue about who is in or not in heaven? Should we not make it our focus to love everyone enough so that we all can take part in such a celebration? Be busy loving and you find little time for fighting.